<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>Research on sgarland.dev</title>
    <link>https://sgarland.dev/tags/research/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Research on sgarland.dev</description>
    <generator>Hugo -- 0.147.3</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 04:52:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://sgarland.dev/tags/research/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Ascertaining Gender of Github Users to Determine PR Comment Sentiment, or How to Spend Money in the Cloud and Pretend you&#39;re a Data Scientist</title>
      <link>https://sgarland.dev/posts/2020-11-10-ascertaining-gender-of-github/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 04:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://sgarland.dev/posts/2020-11-10-ascertaining-gender-of-github/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;This is not so much of a SRE post, be ye warned, but it does discuss solving problems creatively. WARNING: Blindly following this will result in incurring costs from cloud providers, potentially quite a bit. It&amp;rsquo;s not my fault if you don&amp;rsquo;t calculate how much your task will cost. As an example, had I used AWS Comprehend for my sentiment analysis, I calculated the cost at ~$15,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why on earth would you need to know the gender of Github users, you ask? If you&amp;rsquo;re conducting research on bias in pull request acceptance rates, that&amp;rsquo;s why. I&amp;rsquo;ll leave the background and meta-analysis of existing literature for, you know, the actual report. The tl;dr is that research suggests that women&amp;rsquo;s pull requests are declined at a higher rate than men&amp;rsquo;s if they are identifiable as a woman in their avatar, despite &lt;a href=&#34;https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308716997_Gender_bias_in_open_source_Pull_request_acceptance_of_women_versus_men&#34;&gt;statistically creating objectively better code&lt;/a&gt;. The tl;dr of my findings is that I failed to reject the null hypothesis, with the heavy caveats of me using a small subset of data, having only a single semester of experience with machine learning, and only training the model on a subset of my subset of data. YMMV, and I in no way want to express finality on my findings. The report and all scripts &lt;a href=&#34;https://github.com/stephanGarland/ut-masters-report-public&#34;&gt;are here.&lt;/a&gt; You should follow along in the report, Chapter 3, if you want detailed instructions on how this all works together.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
